|
|
American Pediatric Society & Society for Pediatric Research Public Policy Council |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
August/September 2003 Legislative Report |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
As
Congress recessed for the month of August, the majority
leadership of the House and Senate applauded their
accomplishments so far in this first session of the 108th
Congress, and set forth a full and ambitious agenda for
September. The
first 7 months of the 108th Congress were consumed with two main
issues: Iraq, and the economy.
With the country entering and theoretically ending war
with Iraq during the first months of 2003, the continuing US
involvement in the Middle East and other issues surrounding
homeland security and bioterrorism dominated much of the debate
on Capitol Hill. Moreover,
a troubled economy, a record deficit—$450 billion—and
battles over taxes—not to mention the first Presidential
primaries and party caucuses only 5 months away—continue to
weigh heavily on the minds of Members of Congress. A
clear message was sent from key Members of Congress early this
year—funding for discretionary health programs was going to be
exceedingly tight, and even as the House moved quickly on its FY
2004 Labor/HHS/Education appropriations bill, that message
proved true. When Congress returns in September, the Senate will
be taking up its version and the message is likely to be the
same. Nevertheless,
the health community continues to work hard for - at the least -
comparable funding levels to FY 2003 for some programs
significantly cut. Additionally,
hoping to capitalize on the momentum set by the Senate in
passing its pediatric rule legislation in July, the pediatric
community is working with key House members to see that a
hard-fought victory is realized for pediatric drug testing in
this Congress. Members
of the American Pediatric Society, Society for Pediatric
Research and the Association of Medical School Pediatric
Department Chairs are urged to reach out to their Members of
Congress in August and for the remainder of this session of
Congress to advocate for key health and pediatric-specific
issues. The
following is an update and summary of recent federal legislative
and regulatory activities of interest to the pediatric academic
community that will assist you in your advocacy.
This report includes information on the following issues: National
Institute of Health (NIH)/Appropriations: Through its work
with the Ad Hoc Group for Medical Research Funding, the PPC
continues to support an adequate increase above current year
funding for the NIH in FY 2004. The Ad Hoc Group for Medical
Research Funding is a coalition of more then 300 patient and
voluntary health groups, medical and scientific societies,
academic and research organizations, and industry. In addition,
the PPC continues to advocate for an increase in funding for the
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
to $1.3 billion in FY 2004. NICHD is currently funded at $1.2
billion. After
essentially completing the five-year doubling of the NIH budget,
the President's FY 2004 budget proposal contained a very modest
2% increase—$27.7 billion—for NIH.
The full House provided $27.6 billion in its FY 2004 L/HHS/Education
bill; the Senate Appropriations Committee provided $27.9
billion. The Senate is scheduled to begin its floor
deliberations on its version of the FY 2004 L/HHS/Education
appropriations bill in early September. ACTION
NEEDED: Urge your senators to support the proposed Specter/Harkin
amendment to the FY 2004 L/HHS/Education bill (S.1356) to
increase funding by $1.5 billion for the NIH - a 9.2% increase
above the FY 2003 appropriations for NIH. National
Children's Study: The National Children's Study (NCS) - a
national longitudinal study of environmental effects (including
physical, chemical, biological and psychosocial) on the health
and development of more than 100,000 children across the United
States - is currently still in the planning phase. The pediatric
community continues to be very involved in this important study.
The Study's Advisory Committee, which includes several
pediatricians, will convene again in September and the National
Children's Study Assembly, "the primary vehicle for sharing
information among stakeholders," will take place in
Atlanta, Georgia on December 17. Further information and updates
are available at http://www.nationalchildrensstudy.gov. The
Public Policy Council and the Ambulatory Pediatric Association
have proposed for the 2004 PAS public policy plenary session a
panel discussion and update on the National Children's Study.
Duane Alexander, MD, director of NICHD, has tentatively agreed
to present. The PPC is exploring other speakers involved with
the NCS. Elena Fuentes-Afflick, MD, MPH, a member of the PPC,
will moderate the panel discussion. Pediatric
Research Loan Repayment: Last year the NIH released its new
loan repayment program for pediatric and clinical researchers (http://www.lrp.nih.gov),
which allows for eligible researchers and trainees supported by
governmental (including AHRQ) and private, nonprofit grants to
apply to NIH for loan repayment. Applications for extramural NIH
loan repayment for FY 2004 will open September 1, 2003, and will
close December 31, 2003. Eligibility criteria and other program information are listed
on the NIH website at www.LRP.nih.gov.
The
pediatric academic community is working with the 108th Congress
to ensure continued support for these important loan repayment
programs across a spectrum of pediatric research needs. FY
2002 Pediatric Research Initiative Report to Congress: In
late July, the NIH released its annual report to Congress and
the public on the FY 2002 Pediatric Research Initiative.
This report, mandated by the Children's Health Act (PL
106-310), outlines the total funds the NIH has obligated to
pediatric research and shows the new NIH funding opportunities
in FY 2002 that increased support for pediatric biomedical
research and training. Senator Mike DeWine (R-OH) has indicated
his intention to offer a non-binding sense of the Senate
resolution during floor debate on the FY 2004 L/HHS/Education
bill to continue to support and encourage ongoing pediatric
research at the NIH. Therapeutic
Cloning - Legislation: In February 2003, Senators Orrin
Hatch (R-UT), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Arlen Specter (R-PA),
Edward Kennedy (D-MA), Tom Harkin (D-IA), and Zell Miller (D-GA)
introduced S.303, a bill that would ban human reproductive
cloning but allow somatic cell nuclear transplantation (SCNT) to
move ahead with federal oversight. The Human Cloning Ban and
Stem Cell Protection Act of 2003 makes it a crime to clone or
attempt to clone a human being, but permits nuclear
transplantation to be conducted on unfertilized eggs for up to
14 days, under strict ethical and federal regulation. This bill
currently has ten co-sponsors. On the House side, also in
February, the House Judiciary Committee approved H.R. 534, a
bill sponsored by Reps. Dave Weldon (R-FL) and Bart Stupak
(D-MI), that would totally ban all human cloning, including SCNT.
The committee rejected by party-line votes a number of
amendments offered by Democrats, including proposals to allow
the use of SCNT for therapeutic and research uses and to permit
the importation of medical treatments derived from human cloned
embryos. After defeating an alternative amendment, the House
passed the bill on February 24, by a vote of 241 - 155. Senators
Sam Brownback (R-KS) and Mary Landrieu (D-LA) introduced a
Senate companion bill to the Weldon-Stupak legislation, S.245.
The Brownback-Landrieu bill currently has 28 co-sponsors. At the
time of this writing there is limited activity on these bills. Agency
for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)/Appropriations:
Throughout the budget process the PPC, as part of a broad-based
coalition, the Friends of AHRQ, has supported increased funding
for AHRQ - $390 million - in FY 2004. AHRQ's current funding is
$303.7 million including $55 million for research on
reducing medical errors. President Bush's FY 2004 budget
proposal recommended $279 million - a decrease of almost $25
million. Both the
House-passed appropriations bill and the Senate Appropriations
Committee approved bill contain level funding - $303.7 million -
for FY 2004. Impact
on Research of the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA): This past April, the new federal
health information privacy regulations took effect. These
regulations are part of the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA) and require new practices and
policies of all medical schools and teaching hospitals
institutions. The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC)
formed a consortium to monitor and document the effects of HIPAA
on medical and health services research to identify any needed
legislative or regulatory relief efforts in the future. The AAMC
has developed a database to receive and record credible data on
HIPAA's impact on research, and ultimately use the information
gathered to inform future policy recommendations. The Public
Policy Council is participating in this consortium. In the first
two months the AAMC's database was in place, nearly 100 case
reports were completed and submitted. The responses focused on
the following areas: recruiting subjects, consent
process/interaction with participants, IRB review and approval,
and general burden of new systems (time, cost, etc.).
For further information and to report the impact of HIPAA
on research visit the AAMC web site http://services.aamc.org/easurvey.
For questions or comments contact the AAMC Division of
Biomedical and Health Sciences Research, (202) 828-0484. IOM
Committee on Clinical Research Involving Children: The IOM
has convened a Committee on Clinical Research Involving Children
to review and consider federal regulations, federally prepared
or supported reports, federally supported evidence-based
research, and other sources of available information related to
research involving children.
The Committee is chaired by Richard Behrman, MD,
Executive Chair of the Pediatric Education Steering Committee of
the Federation of Pediatric Organizations and includes several
pediatricians, including Drs. Russ Chesney (a member of the PPC),
Francis Sessions Cole, III, Robert "Skip" Nelson,
David Poplack, Bonnie Ramsey and Stephen Spielberg. A public
hearing and meeting was held July 9–11, 2003. Christine
Gleason, MD, representing the APS/SPR and APA, David Schonfeld,
MD, representing the AAP, and George Dover, MD representing
AMSPDC were among those participating in this hearing.
The statements of all of these and the participants from
the meeting are available at www.iom.edu/subpage.asp?id=13665.
The Committee will finish its work in December; its
report to Congress is scheduled to be released in March 2004. Secretary's
Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections: The
inaugural meeting of the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Human
Research Protections (formerly known as the National Research
Protections Advisory Committee) met on July 22, 2003.
SACHRP was chartered in October 2002 to advise the
Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
on issues concerning research involving human subjects, with
particular emphasis on special populations such as neonates and
children, prisoners, and pregnant women, embryos, and fetuses.
In addition, the committee is responsible for reviewing
selected ongoing work and planned activities of the Office of
Human Research Protections (OHRP), such as a review of assurance
systems, the application of minimal research risk standards, and
the ongoing monitoring and oversight of institutional review
boards (IRBs) and the institutions that sponsor research. SACHRP
indicated that it will look to create a pediatric working group
after the IOM Committee on Clinical Research Involving Children
report release to address pediatric-specific issues.
Additional information, including its charter, can be
found on the Committee's website, at http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/sachrp/sachrp.htm. The
Pediatric Rule: In October 2002, the U.S. Federal District
Court in Washington, DC, struck down the Pediatric Rule, saying
Congress never intended to give the FDA power to require drug
companies to test adult medicines commonly given to children.
In December, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation (EGPAF) filed a
motion in federal court asking for the right to intervene in the
lawsuit over requiring drug companies to test medicines used in
children because the FDA decided not to appeal, stating that
congressional action is the surest and swiftest way to ensure
that the Pediatric Rule is restored.
The appeals process is now in motion.
The AAP and EGPAF are preparing appellate briefs this
month, with follow-up response briefs due in the fall and oral
arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals scheduled for January
22, 2004. Legislation
to Codify the Pediatric Rule: In the 108th Congress
reinstating the Pediatric Rule remains a top priority for the
pediatric academic societies working under the leadership of and
in partnership with the AAP. In
March, Senators Judd Gregg, (Chair of the Senate Health,
Education, Labor and Pensions Committee (HELP)), Edward Kennedy
(D-MA), Mike DeWine (R-OH), Christopher Dodd (D-CT), and Hillary
Clinton (D-NY) introduced and reported out S.
650, the Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003.
This bipartisan legislation restores critical components
of the 1998 pediatric rule, including:
The
pediatric community, including APS, SPR, AMSPDC, has endorsed
the legislation. On
July 23, 2003, in a win for children's therapeutics, the Senate
passed S. 650 by unanimous consent, as amended.
In a manager's amendment offered on the floor by Senator
Gregg, the two outstanding issues - enforcement and effective
date - were appropriately fixed, although a sunset provision
remains. On
July 25, Representatives Jim Greenwood (R-PA), Anna Eshoo (D-CA)
and Deborah Pryce (R-OH) introduced H.R. 2857, the Pediatric
Research Equity Act of 2003, the House bill identical to the
Senate-passed bill. The pediatric community is working aggressively to see that
the House Energy and Commerce Committee consider this
legislation and then bring the bill to the House floor in
September. ACTION
NEEDED: Urge your Representative to support H.R. 2857, the
Pediatric Research Equity Act.
This legislation is identical to the Senate-passed bill,
S. 650. While the PPC does not support the provision in the bill
that time-limits the authority of the FDA to require pediatric
testing, we join with the AAP in believing that the Pediatric
Research Equity Act is strong legislation that at long last
establishes in law the right of children to the same kind of
drug safety and efficacy information that was previously
available only to adults. Children's Hospitals Graduate Medical Education (CHGME): The President's FY 2004 budget contained only $199 million for CHGME. The pediatric academic community is continuing its efforts with the National Association of Children's Hospitals (NACH) to vigorously advocate for adequate and sustained funding—$305 million ($292 million plus an adjustment for inflation)—in FY 2004. The House-passed L/HHS/Ed bill contained $305 million for CHGME in FY 04; the Senate committee language contains less, at $290 million. Titles
VII and VIII-Health Professions Training Grants/Appropriations:
As in FY 2003, the President's FY 2004 budget removed all
funding for primary care, interdisciplinary community projects,
training for diversity, and public health. The president
proposed only $11 million for the Title VII program, although it
does address the nursing shortage through a modest increase for
Title VIII. Current funding for Titles VII and VIII is $421.2
million. On June 26, the Senate Appropriations Committee
approved a bill that provides only $133 million for both Title
VII and VIII in FY 2004. Of this, $113 million is designated for
the Title VIII nursing programs (level with the FY 2003 level),
leaving just $20 million for all of the Title VII health
professions programs. Of this $20 million, $9.9 million is
specified for the Scholarships for Disadvantaged Students and
$5.5 million to expand the pediatric dentistry program, leaving
approximately $5 million for ALL of Title VII health professions
programs. For all intents and purposes, the majority of Title
VII programs, including the General Internal Medicine/General
Pediatrics cluster, have been essentially eliminated by the
Senate Appropriations Committee.
The
full House approved the FY 2004 Labor/HHS/Education bill on July
10, providing $391 million for the program - a 7.1 percent cut
below last year. The
PPC has joined over 40 national organizations in the Health
Professions and Nursing Education Coalition (HPNEC) to support
$550 million for the Title VII and VIII programs in FY 2004. In
addition, the pediatric community continues to support
innovative training for generalist pediatricians through
appropriate funding for the General Internal Medicine/General
Pediatrics program, that is part of Title VII, of at least $40
million. This
represents a step towards a multi-year effort to achieve a
funding level of at least $69 million for the General Internal
Medicine/General Pediatrics programs, as recommended by the
congressionally-established Advisory Committee on Training in
Primary Care Medicine and Dentistry. Ongoing advocacy to restore
funding for the health professions training program is crucial
in the 108th Congress. Reauthorization: The Title VII program was due to be reauthorized in 2002 but was not; therefore, it will likely be taken up in the 108th Congress. This process, if past years are any example, may well take quite some time. The pediatric community is continuing its conversations with colleagues in the internal medicine community. We certainly appreciate the involvement of members of the pediatric academic societies as reauthorization moves forward. If you or your colleagues have examples of how Title VII is working in your institution, or comments on changes or additions that might be needed in the reauthorized bill, please do let us know. (Contact kbutterfield@aap.org). ACTION
NEEED: Urge your Senators/Representative to restore and support
adequate funding for health professions training programs of at
least the House passed funding level of $391 million, and $40
million for general internal medicine/general pediatrics.
Describe specific examples of its importance in faculty
development and to training/educating more pediatricians in a
variety of ambulatory/community based settings. Meeting
a timeline that hasn't been met in several years, Congress began
the FY 2004 appropriations process in earnest in late Spring,
with the House completing most of the 13 bills comprising the
total federal government spending package by July's end.
In May, the PPC submitted a written statement for the
hearing record to the House Appropriations subcommittee. The
statement focused on the importance of ongoing biomedical
research including increasing pediatric research at the NIH,
supporting the training of more pediatric investigators such as
through the pediatric loan repayment program, support for
Children's Hospitals graduate medical education, increasing the
funding for Title VII programs, and the inclusion of children in
clinical trials. The
PPC statement is available at http://www.aps-spr.org/Public_Policy/2003_Docs/Statement0516.htm. On
June 25, the full House Appropriations Committee adopted the
Labor-HHS-Education bill; the Senate Labor-HHS-Education
Subcommittee also approved its bill on June 25, with the full
Committee passing the bill the following day.
On July 10, the full House approved the measure.
Senate Majority Leader Frist (R-TN) has indicated that
the Senate will take up its bill immediately upon returning from
its recess the week of September 1. The House and Senate versions of the spending package
are not dissimilar. For
example, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would
receive $4.55 billion in the House bill and $4.4 billion in the
Senate. Ryan White
AIDS funding would be set at $2 billion under both bills. The
National Institutes of Health is slated to receive $27.6 billion
in the House measure and $27.9 billion in the Senate's measure. Children's Hospital GME is set at $305 million in the House,
$290 million in the Senate. During
consideration of the FY 2004 L/HHS/Education appropriations bill
on the House floor, a troubling amendment offered by Rep. Toomey
(R-PA) to prohibit the NIH from funding five specific research
grants was narrowly defeated, by a vote of 210-212.
The amendment challenged the peer review process at the
NIH and required that funding for these grants, including three
of the five that were sexual health-related research grants, be
redirected toward other research. It is possible that during
full Senate consideration an amendment similar to the House's
Toomey amendment could be offered. In anticipation, the PPC has
joined with many others in the research community in signing a
letter supporting the NIH's merit review process. Overall,
the final FY 2004 L/HHS/Ed appropriations package faces several
possible hurdles including under-funding for education and
several public health programs such as health professions,
immunizations, and HIV/AIDS prevention.
In the end, debate on this bill could go well into the
late fall, although the hope obviously is that it will happen
sooner. ACTION
NEEDED: The August congressional recess is an excellent
opportunity to participate in town hall meetings that your
senators/representative may be convening. Urge them to support
the highest level of funding for maternal and child health
programs important to your community including biomedical and
health services research, independent children's hospital,
mental health, programs addressing infectious diseases, e.g.,
West Nile, SARs, TB, HIV/AIDS, and substance abuse prevention
and treatment programs. HEALTH
INSURANCE COVERAGE AND ACCESS TO CARE SCHIP
FUNDING: There are two State Children's Health Insurance
Program (SCHIP) funding problems for which a legislative remedy
is needed. The
first is the almost $3 Billion in unused SCHIP dollars that have
already or are scheduled to revert back to the federal treasury
by September 30, 2003, and the second is the program funding
"dip," a drop in program funding by more than $1
billion this year and in each of the next two years, the result
of the balanced budget deal enacted in 1997. Over the next three
years, SCHIP program funding will be reduced by 26 percent.
The combination of the "SCHIP Dip" and rising
SCHIP enrollment could cause many states to have insufficient
funds to continue to fund their programs.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) estimated that
national SCHIP enrollment will decline by 900,000 children
between 2003 and 2006 due to these reductions in federal
funding. Prior
to departing for its summer recess the House and the Senate
passed H.R. 2854, legislation that would extend the use of $2.7
billion of unspent SCHIP dollars from FY1998-2001. Fifty percent
of unspent funds would stay with the states and the other half
would be redistributed to those states that have already spent
their allocations. This legislation also would allow those
states that had pre-existing Medicaid expansions (up to at least
185 percent of FPL) to use 20 percent of their original SCHIP
allocations on these beneficiaries-reimbursing the state for the
difference between their Medicaid FMAP and the enhanced SCHIP
rate. In addition, to ensure that all states will be able to use
a portion of its allocations on its pre-existing Medicaid
expansions, specifically New Mexico, a technical correction bill
was unanimously passed by the Senate (S. 1547) that changes the
definition of a qualifying state from "at least 185 percent
FPL" to "at least 184 percent FPL."
It is our understanding that the House is expected to
pass this correction in September. MediKids:
On March 11, 2003, Representative Pete Stark (D-CA) and Senator
John Rockefeller (D-WV) reintroduced the MediKids legislation
(H.R. 1205/S. 588) legislation first introduced in the 107th
Congress. The pediatric community strongly supports this
legislation which would create a unified health care system that
would achieve the goal of health insurance for all children
regardless of family income.
MediKids would make coverage automatic and promote
equity, family responsibility, choice, and uniform benefits.
The MediKids legislation currently has 6 Senate
cosponsors and 45 House cosponsors. Federal
Legislation: Several legislative proposals have been
introduced to address the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).
In April, Sen. Bill Frist (R-TN) introduced the Improved Vaccine
Affordability and Availability Act
(S.754) - similar to a bill introduced last year by Sen.
Frist with additional modifications recommended by the Academy
and the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV). Mark-up on this important legislation has been postponed
numerous times, and it remains unclear when it will be
considered. The
principles that any amendments to this important legislation
must be measured are:
Also,
this year, Senators DeWine (R-OH), Clinton (D-NY), and Reed
(D-RI) introduced S. 371, the Childhood Vaccine Supply Act.
Echoing the recommendations of the General Accounting Office's
September 2002 report, S. 371, requires a national six-month
stockpile for routine childhood vaccines, and requires
manufacturers to give one-year's advance notice when they intend
to stop producing a vaccine, enabling the CDC and FDA to better
monitor the supply stream of vaccines coming into the market,
and allows them more time to prepare for potential shortfalls. IOM
Vaccine Financing Report: On August 4, the Institute of
Medicine released a report Financing Vaccines in the 21st
Century: Assuring Access and Availability.
The report proposes a new vaccine financing program
involving a federal vaccine insurance mandate, subsidy, and
voucher plan. The mandate would require all insurance plans to
include vaccine benefits, and the federal government would
subsidize health plans and providers for the purchase costs and
administration fees created by the vaccine mandate. The
report is available on the IOM website, at http://www.iom.edu/report.asp?id=14451. ACTION
NEEDED: Urge your senators to support and pass S.754 to
strengthen the vitally important Vaccine Injury Compensation
Program and S. 371 to ensure an adequate supply of childhood
vaccines. CONSIDER
JOINING THE AAP FEDERAL ADVOCACY ACTION NETWORK (FAAN) The
American Academy of Pediatrics invites you to become a member of the
Federal Advocacy Action Network (FAAN).
Coordinated by the AAP Department of Federal Affairs, FAAN is a
network of AAP members who help support federal legislative and
regulatory activities from their position as constituents.
FAAN members play an important role in passing federal
legislation that benefits children and pediatricians. The
AAP Department of Federal Affairs gives FAAN members the information
and tools you need to persuade your legislators.
For example, each month via e-mail you will receive FAAN MAIL
with updates on AAP legislative priorities in Washington, D.C.
We will keep you up to date with timely information with
"THIS JUST IN." You
will also receive "SPECIAL ALERTS" when immediate action is
needed by you on a key issue. To
join FAAN go to the Members Only Channel of the AAP web site, www.aap.org/moc, and click on Federal Affairs, then click on Join FAAN
and follow the easy directions.
The Members Only Channel has some great tools to make your
advocacy work easy. Find
the names of Congressional representatives, contact legislators via
e-mail, read about daily congressional activity, view actual bills and
use the media contact list.
If
you are already a member of FAAN, thank you!
If you are interested in joining FAAN and have questions, please
contact Kristin Butterfield (kbutterfield@aap.org) in the AAP
Department of Federal Affairs at 800/336-5475.
Together we can make a real difference for children and
pediatricians! HOW TO CONTACT YOUR MEMBER OF CONGRESS: The congressional district work periods provide a good opportunity for members of the American Pediatric Society, Society for Pediatric Research and the Association of Medical School Pediatric Department Chairs to contact their legislators in their home districts. Because 2002 is a mid-term election year – all 435 members of the House of Representatives and one-third of the Senate are up for re-election - the second session of the 107th Congress will be fairly compact with short work weeks and regular recess/district work periods. (See dates listed below.) Write: Be courteous, to the point, and include key information, using examples, if possible, to support your position. Address only one issue in each letter and, if possible, keep the length to one page.
Call: You can contact your Senators and Representative's office by calling the Capitol Hill Switchboard at 202-224-3121. If you do not know who your Representative is, the switchboard operator will be able to direct you to the proper office. Ask to speak to the staff member who works on health care issues. Be prepared to leave a very short message as well as your name and address. You can also call your legislators in their home districts: information about local offices is available on the Academy's Members Only website at www.aap.org/moc Fax: Most offices have fax machines, so you can call and ask for the fax number if you would like to fax your letter. Some offices do not give out their fax numbers, however. E-mail: All of members of Congress now have e-mail addresses, but there is no set format for them. We suggest calling the member's office to get an accurate e-mail address or visit www.aap.org/moc the Members Only website of the American Academy of Pediatrics. HOW TO CONTACT THE PRESIDENT: Write: Call: 202-456-1414 Fax: 202-456-2461 Email: president@whitehouse.gov
Additional information and resource material on these and other pediatric and child health issues are available from:
Public Policy Council Members:
Report Submitted By:
August 11, 2003 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright:
All information contained
in this Website is the property of the American Pediatric Society and
the Society for Pediatric Research unless otherwise noted. Duplication of any information contained herein for reasons other than personal use requires the expressed written permission of APS / SPR. Last Updated: 10/15/2004 Staff only: Click here to logon to webmail. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||